Insights on business, and practical
ways to improve your own.
Printer
Version
In Defense of Paper
Technology has its place, but ....
by Nancy Nally (July 17, 2006)
(Note: This was written in reaction to CLN's report
of a New York Times article on the growth of digital
scrapbooking. To read other comments on the digital vs. hard-copy
issue, click on Memory,
Paper & Stamps.)
The New York Times seems to think that paper is on its way
out in the scrapbook industry. I would argue that, while that may be
the story in the news industry, it is definitely not the case in the
scrapbook industry.
The New York Times forgot an important part of
scrapbooking in their analysis of paper vs. digital when they
proclaimed the inevitable death of paper scrapbooking: the enjoyment
factor. This element alone, in my opinion, negates their argument in
several ways.
For me, as a scrapbooker, there is just something very satisfying
about the tactile enjoyment of handling the papers and other
materials, and the physical moving around of page elements. Creating
a design on the computer, for me, just lacks that tactile enjoyment
of my work. It feels sterile and cold by comparison. The enjoyment
factor of the tactile process of working with paper elements instead
of with a plastic keyboard should not be undervalued in a world that
is becoming increasingly plastic.
Another argument for paper’s superiority in the "enjoyment
factor" is the social element of scrapbooking. It’s been said
many times that crops are modern-day quilting bees, where women
gather together to engage in their craft while bonding and sharing
time together. Many women become involved in the hobby through their
friends, for primarily this social reason.
But the ability to socialize while scrapbooking is mostly lost to
a digital scrapbooker. Even if a digital scrapbooker has a portable
laptop on which to scrap, a group of women all sitting at their
laptops working at vertical screens does not lend itself to the same
level of social interaction that a group of women sharing a table
working on layouts laid flat in front of them does. They can all see
each other’s work easily, leading easily to discussion. They can
share tools and supplies, promoting interaction. For most scrappers,
a crop is as much about social time as it is about scrapping time,
and digital scrapbooking simply cannot provide that in near the same
way.
The New York Times also seems to forget, apparently
blinded by a love of fancy gadgets, that the highest technology is
not always the superior tool to use for every application. This
becomes very apparent about scrapbooking if you consider archival
issues and the longevity of the results of a scrapbooker’s
creative efforts.
There are two issues in considering the archival life of digital
scrapbooking. The first is the life of the files themselves. Even if
stored correctly, digital media storage will degrade – often in a
space of only two to three years – by simply becoming completely
unreadable, meaning the data is completely lost.
Even if the files survive the storage process, the media or file
type may become obsolete and unreadable in a very few number of
years, thanks to the rapid world of technology development. In
contrast, paper items created with acid-free and lignin-free
products and photographic process prints can last decades with
little sign of degradation if stored correctly. Although they may
eventually show signs of deterioration, even when the layouts are
somewhat damaged the memories are not completely lost.
Printing out digital layouts doesn’t solve these archival
issues. Even under optimum printing and storage conditions, computer
printed layouts have a very short archival life and will yellow and
fade to virtual invisibility in a fraction of the time that
"traditional" paper layouts will show deterioration.
Having the layouts photographically printed can solve this problem,
but this is an expensive process for large page sizes.
Another issue that the New York Times failed to consider
in declaring the death knell of paper scrapbooking is the relative
accessibility of the two forms of the craft. In this area as well, I
believe that the traditional paper form still has a large advantage
over the digital art.
First, there is the question of needed skills. Brand-new paper
scrapbookers can be taught in a two-hour class all the basics they
need to know to be able to jump in and enjoy participating in the
hobby alongside their friends. These basic skills can be easily
acquired by kids, or by people (especially seniors) who aren’t
technically savvy enough to even use a web browser or email. The
learning curve to be a functioning paper scrapper is not steep at
all.
On the other hand, to be a competent digital scrapbooker, you
need to have working knowledge of a computer graphic design program
such as Photoshop Elements. The easiest, most user-friendly of those
programs can take dozens of hours of training and practice to
acquire basic skills in using, even if you are tech-savvy to begin
with.
Another factor regarding the accessibility of the two forms of
scrapbooking is the price of the initial investment that a new
scrapbooker must make. A new paper scrapper needs scissors, some
adhesive and some paper and embellishments. A new digital
scrapbooker needs a computer graphics program often costing $100 or
more – and a computer capable of running it, which may require an
upgrade to their existing machine. That is a large investment to
make before you’ve even made your first page!
I will concede the point to the Times that digital
scrapbooking requires less space to participate in because there are
no paper supplies and no physical tools to be stored, and no paper
books to store. However, I believe that the benefits of paper
scrapbooking far outweigh the room that it takes to do. And I have
seen some dedicated scrappers whose entire supplies are stored in a
large scrapbook supply tote, so I know the amount of space devoted
to paper supplies does not have to be overwhelming for the activity
to be enjoyable.
Before the digital scrapbooking mob hangs me in effigy, please
allow me to say that I do not hate digital scrapbooking! I actually
am in the process of learning to do some digital scrapbooking
myself, and I have great respect for many of the digital scrapbook
artists whose work that I see regularly such as Shannon Freeman,
Anne Langpap, and Rhonna Farrer. Their work is unquestionably
beautiful and inspires me in my creating. However, I do not foresee
digital ever being my primary format of creation, for the many
reasons that I mentioned above. I will use those skills for specific
projects but paper will always be my main artistic outlet.
I believe that the future of scrapbooking will come in the
blending of digital skills and tools with a paper base. Already we
are seeing that integration begin. It began awhile ago with
journaling. For a long time, most dedicated paper scrapbookers have
typeset their journaling for their pages on the computer and then
printed it out to adhere to their pages. Fonts are now a
high-profile market segment because of companies like Creating
Keepsakes and Two Peas in a Bucket, who create and market fonts
directly for and to scrapbookers.
The digital integration movement has continued with the shift
towards digital photography. More scrapbookers using digital
photography also means more scrapbookers using digital photo editing
and enhancing techniques, cropping and fixing photos, or applying
digital effects before printing them for use on their pages.
Finally, another big step towards this integration has recently
taken place as more paper scrapbookers are using their computers to
create more advanced elements that will be used on their paper pages
– such as decorative transparencies, clip art masks and die-cuts,
and other custom page elements. There are some new high-tech tools
(albeit with some hefty price tags) available to scrapbookers to do
these things, such as Xyron’s Design Runner portable
handheld printer, and their Wishblade, a computerized
die-cutting system. ProvoCraft also is making the Cricut, a
computerized cutting system, and the Pazzles Creative Cutter is
another pioneer in that category.
Rather than killing the category altogether, technology will take
paper scrapbooking to new heights and offer new levels of
customization to some hobbyists while still allowing paper to
maintain its basic foundation of assets that will provide the
category its long-term stability.
(Note: Nancy is a designer in the scrapbook segment of the
crafts industry and recently began writing in that area as well. She
is the author of the blog, Inside Scrapbooking (http://insidescrapbooking.typepad.com),
about issues and news of interest to serious and professional
designers. She is also a regular contributor Creative TECHniques. You
can read her resume at www.scrapbookresumes.com/NancyNally.
To comment on Nancy's article, email CLN at mike@clnonline.com.)
xxx